What Forms of Schadenfreude, if Any, Should be Pardonable?

As a boy, general or normal human nature—including that aspect involving one person’s pleasure derived from another’s misfortune—bewildered and scared me; as a teenager, it frustrated and tormented me. As an adult, I’m concerned and even angered by it. Enough so to enthusiastically watch, on multiple occasions, The Experimenter (about sociologist Stanley Milgram and his controversial Obedience Experiments), and to read the book The Joy of Pain: Schadenfreude and the Dark Side of Human Nature (Richard H. Smith) and typeset onto my computer the most interesting parts. 

A case about which I read in a newspaper column that will undoubtedly be deemed by most readers as one understandably deserving, relatively speaking, of their shameful pleasure is that of a man convicted of murdering an 18-year-old woman and her infant who himself was then severely beaten while in prison and felt his assailant got off easy by the justice system.

It was last June, however, that a very disturbing form of schadenfreude was front and centre in the news: It was revealed that accusations were under investigation by our provincial government that some British Columbian ER doctors and nurses were playing games in which they’d guess heavily intoxicated patients’ “blood alcohol level without going over” (likely an allusion to the famous Price Is Right TV game show rule involving product prices). 

Particularly troubling was the accusation that most of those ER ‘games’ involved the racist stereotyping of Indigenous walk-in patients.  

The apparent scandal immediately brought to mind a book passage explaining how such discriminatory conduct towards patients, however inappropriate, unjust and seemingly cruel, can be the health professionals’ means of psychologically coping with the great trauma they’re frequently surrounded by and treat.  

Essentially, by subtly blaming the patients for their own suffering—e.g. making fun out of frequent ER patients by playing games guessing their blood alcohol levels—somehow it translates into their suffering somehow being deserved.    

The Joy of Pain also cited the book The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion (Melvin J. Lerner), in which the author describes his own experiences while working with doctors and nurses caring for psychiatric patients.  

Smith wrote: “… [Lerner] saw many instances of these professionals joking about their patients behind their backs, sometimes to their faces. These reactions jarred him because, generally, these patients were unlucky souls and had little control over their psychological problems. But he did not view his colleagues as callous. Rather, he concluded that their reactions were coping responses to the unpleasant reality they confronted in these patients. If these patients largely seemed to ‘deserve’ their troubles, one could feel comfortable joking about them … ”  

Nonetheless, considering their profession, immense training/education and the poorest of souls they treat, these to me are among the least excusable, albeit understandable, forms of shameful pleasure.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

A Young and Naïve Child’s Bad Deal From an Ordeal

IT’S amazing how frightening a positive ‘white’ scenario instantly turning into that of a negative ‘black’ can be for a very young child, for it is common enough for that child to thus experience catastrophization, even if it is of his or her own making—indeed, law-breaking mountains out of childhood-experimenting molehills.

In the White Rock of 1972, on one sunny afternoon, I was granted the honor of hanging out with my three older siblings, all of whom were accompanied by their own similarly aged friends. A five-year-old boy, I was about two years the junior of the younger of my two older sisters who was herself the next youngest amongst the whole group; thus, naturally I was the sole person to whom no one from the group (totaling seven) paid much, if any, attention. That fact was not their problem, as far as they were concerned, on that sunny afternoon. Contrarily, it much appeared to be but mine and with which I’d have to disturbingly deal alone.

Eventually came the point at which the sunny afternoon suddenly went astray and behavior became mischievous.

One moment, I was with the others inside an aged, abandoned, single-floor house as everyone investigated decrepit furniture and other items; the next moment, some of my people blurted out an alarming warning, with all of my people scattering away, outwards in every direction. I, however, just stood there completely bewildered and alone, looking around the briefly empty place for a couple of seconds.

As a result of that day’s ordeal, I would know early-childhood abandonment trauma.

Instead of my people, there suddenly stood a half-dozen boys, all surely at least twice my age. They more than sufficiently surrounded me, as though they actually believed that I wasn’t too petrified to attempt a dash and perhaps successful evasion.

They all worked with law enforcement, they fooled me effectively enough to induce formidable fear in me: “Have you ever heard of the Mod Squad?” asked one, perhaps their ‘leader.’ (FYI: The Mod Squad was at first a 1968-commenced, bit-of-a-hit TV series, followed by a not-so-hot, 1999 motion picture about the three rather rogue criminals-turned-law-enforcement demi-agents.)

To the present day, I can’t recall what was my intimidated reply. Perhaps a muffled and/or squeaky “Yeah,” or nothing at all.

“Well, we’re with the Mod Squad,” said another.

It’s amazing how naïve we can perceive ourselves to have been at a very young age, though of course with the advantage of clear hindsight. However, experiencing mind-numbing ordeals real-time is too immediate to adequately analyze, and exceptionally so at such a cerebrally and psychologically undeveloped point in a very young child’s life.

The rather young Mod Squad recruits soon escorted me outside and onto the street, all the while having completely encircled me. It was quite apparent that the poor condition of the abandoned house did not matter at all to them, for their disinterest in that fact allowed them artificial cause to psychologically torment a small and skinny, very young, redheaded squirt like me.

They took me along the neighborhood streets (e.g. Pacific Avenue) lining steeply-slanted southeastern White Rock, from where I could see an unobstructed sunny Blaine, Washington (State), which like White Rock was also adjacent to Semiahmoo Bay; meanwhile they acted out a fantasy of theirs as some sort of enforcers of justice or apprehenders of very young, bad boys.

But their fantasy fun was at my emotional expense, since I was the one living a daylight nightmare, whimpering and weeping a few times; it was my first brush with some form of albeit self-anointed ‘law.’

The Mod Squaders walked me a block to where two streets met, and looking up one (i.e. Habgood Street), we, the Mod Squaders and I, spotted my people, who themselves were looking down the same street at us, as they walked in the same direction (eastward, along Cliff Avenue).

It was at that point that my people may have realized that the entire bad situation may not be just my problem, but perhaps it was also soon-to-be their predicament as well; they may have then felt baffled and concerned over what they and I were supposed to and would do about it all.

Both sides continued to walk our parallel paths eastward, though a long-block apart, at pretty much the same walking pace; and we both would stop two more times at two more intersections to look up and down the long-block at each other.

The last thing that I, four decades later, can recall regarding that ordeal is being at home with my unhappy parents after the police, obviously contacted by the Mod Squaders, had just left. As for my people, I don’t remember them being in the said picture at the later point of that sunny afternoon, not even my three older siblings. Logic dictated that it was not in my siblings’ best interests to be around me, Mom and/or Dad, considering the fact that they played a large part in the cause of the entire unfortunate incident.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

Society — Not Just the Cat Fans Within — Needs to Start Showing That It Cares About Needless Feline Suffering

Many of us can appreciate the reciprocally healthy, perhaps even somewhat symbiotic, relationships that can exist between pet cats and their lovingly appreciative human hosts, especially when the host lives with physical and/or mental ailments. Whenever I observe anxiety in the facial expression of my aging mother, I can also witness how that stress suddenly drains and is replaced with joyful adoration upon her cat entering the room. “Hi, sweetheart,” she’ll say. Countless other seniors with a cat also experience its emotional benefits. Of course, the cat’s qualities, especially an un-humanly innocence, makes losing that pet someday such a heartbreaking experience.

Perhaps cats have a beneficial effect on the human psyche that most people still cannot fathom thus appreciate. That unawareness may help explain why it was reported a few years ago that Surrey, British Columbia, had an estimated 36,000 feral cats, very many of which suffer severe malnourishment, debilitating injury and/or infection (I’ve seen many shocking, heart-wrenching images). And why the municipal government, as well as aware yet uncaring residents, did little or nothing to help with the local non-profit Trap/Neuter/Release program, regardless of their documented success in reducing the needless great suffering by these beautiful animals.

(Once, a TNR-program staffer left me a phone message in which she emotionally thanked me for my $500 donation. I deduced that the organization may rarely or never receive such large private donations, which may indicate to her that society collectively doesn’t care about such terrible yet preventable immense feline affliction.)

Recently, I contacted Surrey Community Cat Foundation and was informed that, if anything, their “numbers would have increased, not decreased, in the last 5 years.”

I was also informed that the problems continuing for feral cats and strays in Surrey, B.C. are:

•        The increase in population and the lack of interest by more residents in caring for strays.

•        Lack of affordable pet friending housing causing cat owners to leave their pet behind and outdoor.

•        Tear-down of older homes where there was feeding done by the resident or the neighborhood.

•        New construction and lack of places for ferals and strays to go.

•        Lack of City participation in reducing the suffering of all the cats (ferals and strays) by providing funding for a City veterinary hospital including low or no fees for low income spay/neuter.

•        Increase in residential housing and condos with developer fees not being put toward the care of misplaced feral and stray cats on the land. 

•        Lack of cooperation with City services that are unable or do not want to care for stray cats that are not tame.

•        No place to house trapped feral cats.

•        Barn locations must be checked out and meet high criteria for the care of the animal. Colonies cannot be maintained without a resident caretaker and a food supply. …

In direct contrast, though, I have read about how much otherwise-homeless cats are greatly appreciated and very well treated by strangers in some European cities, such as Istanbul.

[Frank G. Sterle Jr.]

Human Beings — Including Substance Abusers — Should NEVER Be Considered Disposable

I have found that, in this world, a large number of people, however precious their souls, can tragically be consciously or subconsciously considered disposable by others (especially governmental bean-counters and other decision-makers) because they are debilitatedly addicted to drugs. Then those people may begin perceiving themselves as worthless and consume their addictive substances more haphazardly. Although the cruel devaluation of them as human beings is basically based on their self-medicating, it still reminds me of the devaluation, albeit perhaps subconsciously, of the daily civilian lives lost (a.k.a. “casualties”) in protractedly devastating civil war zones and sieges. At some point, they can end up receiving just a meagre couple column inches in the First World’s daily news.

While I have not been personally affected by the opioid addiction/overdose crisis, I have suffered enough unrelenting ACE-related hyper-anxiety to have known, enjoyed and appreciated the great release upon consuming alcohol and/or THC. I further understand the callous politics involved with this most serious social issue: Just government talk about increasing funding to make proper treatment available to low- and no-income addicts, however much it would alleviate their great suffering, generates firm opposition by the general socially and fiscally conservative electorate. Therefore most, if not all, political candidates will typically, tragically avoid this hot potato at election time.

There’s a preconceived notion that substance (ab)users are but weak-willed and/or have somehow committed a moral crime. Ignored is that such intense addiction usually does not originate from a bout of boredom, where a person repeatedly consumed recreationally but became heavily hooked — and homeless, soon after — on an unregulated often-deadly chemical that eventually destroyed their life and even those of loved-ones.

Serious psychological trauma, typically adverse childhood experiences, is usually behind a substance abuser’s debilitating lead-ball-and-chain self-medicating. The addiction likely resulted from his/her attempt at silencing through self-medicating the pain of serious life trauma or PTSD. Furthermore, we know that pharmaceutical corporations intentionally pushed their very addictive and profitable opiate pain killers — I call it the real moral crime — for which they got off relatively lightly, considering the resulting immense suffering and overdose death numbers.

(Dis)Grace

A believer in Christ and his unmistakable miracles, I would be quite willing to consistently say grace every day of every year if everyone on Earth—and not just a minority of the planet’s populace—had enough clean, safe drinking water and nutritional food to maintain a normal, healthy daily life; and I’d be pray-fully ‘thankful’ if every couple’s child would survive his or her serious illness rather than just a small portion of such sick children.

Furthermore, what  makes so many of us believe that collective humanity should be able to enjoy the pleasures of free will, but cry out for and expect divine mercy and rescue when our free will ruins our figurative good day—i.e. that we should have our cake and eat it, too?

Obviously, it’s not desirable to challenge one of humanity’s greatest institutions on record—i.e. praying and saying grace to an omnipotent/omniscient entity—a pathetic fact quite evident by the total absence of this missive in virtually every newspaper on Earth.

Lastly, is it only me, or is there some truly unfortunate, bitter irony in holding faith and hope in prayer—when unanswered prayer results in an increase in skeptical atheism and/or agnosticism?

Thus, the following poem was penned with sincere consideration of the countless people planetwide for whom there’s nothing to be thankful on Thanksgiving Day—nor any other day of the year, for that matter—COVID-19 crisis or not.

GRACE

Pass me the holiday turkey, peas
and the delicious stuffing flanked
by buttered potatoes with gravy
since I’ve said grace with plenty ease,
for the good food received I’ve thanked
my Maker who’s found me worthy.
It seems that unlike the many of those
in the unlucky Third World nation,
I’ve been found by God deserving
to not have to endure the awful woes
and the stomach wrenching starvation
suffered by them with no dinner serving.
Therefore hand over to me the corn
the cranberry sauce, fresh baked bread
since for my grub I’ve praised the Lord,
yet I need not hear about those born
whose meal I’ve been granted instead,
as they receive naught of the grand hoard.  

I’m Sor-ry, So Sor-ry, That I-I-I-I Was Such a Foool

I’M left somewhat discouraged by the prevalence of fellow human beings who in content conscience procure and indefinitely retain employment involving the exploitation of gambling addicts. While one might expect such disgracefulness from privately-owned casinos, one would expect more ethical conduct from government-owned and operated lotteries and other games, which in this province comes in the form of the British Columbia Lottery Corporation (BCLC).

Unfortunately, though, BCLC is callously misusing the debilitating weaknesses of their more ‘loyal’ consumers, especially those with obsessive-compulsive tendencies. As for BCLC’s token offers of gambling-addiction withdrawal counselling services as well as their ads’ quite insufficient “Know your limit, play within it” and/or “If you gamble, use your GameSense … 19+”, it all hardly suffices for the significant and often irreparable financial damage done to addicts and their families.

Also playing a significant role in this unfortunate social issue is that BCLC is one of the largest, if not the largest, advertiser with Greater Vancouver’s four metro-daily newspapers, including the freebee publications Metro and 24 Hours; the latter two dailies, in fact, sell full front and back tabloid-jacket ads to the lottery corporation whenever there’s a large jackpot accumulating, and almost always those lottery-ad-jacketed issues come out as the very well consumed weekend editions. Indeed, it’s hardly a plausible coincidence that a reader won’t see printed in the said four dailies any editorial content critical of questionable BCLC ethical (mis)conduct.

There’s psychological research documentation noting that gambling addicts intentionally, though on a subconscious level, play games of chance until they lose everything. This formidable symptom of a gambling addiction can reach an extreme, one example having been aptly demonstrated in the film Owning Mahowny: The movie is a fact-based account of a compulsive gambler from Toronto, who, as a well-positioned senior banker with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, embezzled millions from his employer in the early 1980s (CIBC then being the second largest bank in Canada) to feed his personal gambling habit at casinos in Las Vegas and Atlantic City. The story’s protagonist gambling-addict banker manages to ‘break’ a casino table thus win its entire funding (for the time being, anyhow) which is typically in the millions) yet could not peel himself away from the casino establishment until he had (frustratingly for me and no doubt many other viewers) lost everything he’d won as well as the mega-money with which he came to town. I’ve been informed that gambling addicts are known for this kind of defeatist behaviour in order to (again subconsciously) feel justified in their post-large-monetary-loss self-flogging of their own psyches.

According to the BCLC’s 2006/2007 annual report, titled “Our Commitment to British Columbia,” the corporation had allocated only 27 percent of all games-played revenue back into prizes won (which includes consolation prize amounts); operations costs received seven percent; 22 percent went to retailers’ sales commissions as well as “casino and bingo service provider companies,” and 0.8 percent was spent on ticket paper and printing. The remaining 43.2 percent went into government ministry social programs. In the BCLC report describing in general the crown corporation’s distribution of gaming revenue for the fiscal year 2012/13, only 24 cents(!?!) of each revenue dollar went back towards prizes; 41 percent went to “Provincial & Community Programs”, with 33 percentage points of that amount going to health care, education and consolidated revenue and eight percentage points going to ‘host local governments & gaming grants to community organizations’”; 22 percent goes towards commissions and fees for ticket retailers, nine percent for operating expenses and four percent towards “federal taxes for essential government services” (with that latter tax being fairly new, to my knowledge).

As for the actual relatively meagre portion of each dollar going back towards prizes—where revenues ethically and justly foremost belong, contrary to being treated more like an afterthought—all I received was a silent stare from the vendors with whom I talked about the abovementioned revenue-allocation percentage-pie, specifically their seemingly non-informed status when I erroneously stated that 50 percent goes towards prizes. Such ignorance on their part was not at all plausible since as licensed vendors one could safely conclude that they’d have to know that not even half of my mistaken 50-percent figure goes back to all winning ticket payouts. Furthermore, it proved equally elusive for me in acquiring those latest percentage-pie revenue-allocation figures from BCLC staff with whom I talked on the phone; and their website was just as difficult when I tried to access those same allocation amounts, which were tucked away in some tiny corner of BCLC’s own microscopic piece of cyberspace.

Exceptionally discreditable BCLC conduct involved the self-serving “jackpot disentitlement rule” aspect of the formal “voluntary exclusion [request]” which falls under the Gaming Control Act. It enabled both publicly and privately owned gaming entities to withhold sizeable winnings from addicts who had signed onto the ethically inexcusable agreement (presumably since then amended in compliance with the court’s ruling); however, large-profit gaming interests had contradictorily permitted themselves to keep any and all gambling losses suffered by those same addicts who were denied their winnings from the same said large-profit gaming interests. A lawyer representing two plaintiffs who had their large winnings withheld by BCLC, though later ordered by a court to be rightfully handed back over to the plaintiffs, said that he had hoped the ruling would have retroactively ordered all such withheld winnings to be returned to their gambling-addict owners, regardless of the exclusionary agreement. “The lottery corporation had no right to withhold the winnings as a penalty [while] they’re taking both the losings and the winnings.”

Also situated on the spectrum of unethical conduct is BCLC’s relatively insidious negative-option-like Extra!: Whenever a player buys any printer-issued lottery ticket (the most prominent being Lotto MAX and Lotto 6/49) BCLC’s computer grid automatically selects for the player four numbers at random between one and 99, which will always appear on the purchased ticket. Before it does, though, it’s left to the player to either fork over the Extra! one dollar or to decline, which in the latter case the word “NO” is printed instead of “YES” adjacent to those four Extra! numbers, which means the consumer does not receive the $500,000 top prize if his/her unsolicited four numbers are drawn. Common sense strongly suggests that BCLC’s intent decision to force the four Extra! numbers upon every player’s every printed ticket is to create some trepidation in the minds of players who choose to not play the Extra! numbers. By this I mean, when checking their regular ticket numbers, some “NO”-Extra! players brave-it by checking whether any of their ineligible-to-win Extra! numbers had in fact been drawn; and some will do so solely to confirm that they had made the right choice, which the odds do favour that they did, and therefore saved an otherwise wasted buck. For the record, as a consistent No-Extra! sometimes-player of Lotto MAX and 6/49 (i.e. when their jackpots have irresistibly accumulated in size) I, without exception, never compare the drawn Extra! numbers with those four rejected unsolicited numbers on my ticket, for ignorance can often be a necessary bliss.

Then again, perhaps lottery consumers are supposed to be thankful that BCLC didn’t go all out and have their ticket scan-check computer loudly announce to the player that their Extra! numbers (or even just three of them, which is worth $1,000), as chance would have it, were drawn, but to which the consumer unfortunately said “NO”; and in place of the celebratory “We’re in the money!” tune played whenever any prize is won (even just a meagre one dollar prize) the said computer would play Brenda Lee’s 1960 hit song “I’m Sorry”.

As it were, that same (rather depressing) tune as well as its lyrics were effectively utilized by BCLC in television ads broadcasted not that long ago that seemed to stoop to an ethical record low; they incorporated into their mass message the psychology of human fear, one involving devastated regret over missing out on a large prize, all because of one’s own choice of ‘cheapness’.

One version of the TV ads shows a despondent lottery-ticket consumer—unfortunately (or foolishly) aware of the identity of the four Extra! numbers forced upon him via his ticket—so miserable over having “said ‘NO’ to half a million dollars,” that he’d withdrawn to beneath his bed, against the wall in a fetal position, with his very concerned wife futilely attempting to slide to him dinner on a tray. The ads’ message was always crystal clear: If only he/she had only parted with the paltry dollar and said YES to half a million dollars; meanwhile, Brenda Lee’s lyric’s chime in apparent accordance—“I-I-I’m sor-ry, sooo sor-ry, that I-I-I-I waaas such a , with the singing fading into the commercial’s close, just barely excluding the final lyric, fooool (very likely to avoid crossing too far over the fine PR line). However, it seems that the real “sorry … fool” may be the game player who believes that BCLC plays fairly; for every player has to pay/fund various interests’ outreached hands to the tune of 76 cents of every dollar he pays in order to play—all before he can dream about winning a very small piece of the 24 cents from every dollar paid to BCLC that’s left for all prize payouts.

For those not already familiar, the actual odds of winning anything by playing the Extra!: matching all four Extra!-draw numbers requires an astronomically-low-odds bulls-eye hit of 1-in-3,764,376; the chances of matching three out of four numbers is 1-in-9,906 (for $1,000); you have a 1-in-141chance of matching two numbers (for $10), and one number, 1-in-6.8, nets you naught but your buck back. The overall odds of winning any Extra! prize is 1-in-6.5, which, contrary to still common misinterpretation, doesn’t in the least translate into one out of every six and a half plays purchased wins one of the prize categories. Confusing, yes; but, if anything, that misinterpretation is in BCLC’s best interests.

Also, I regularly find large extravagant scratch-&-win game cards—each costing either $3, $5, $10, or even as much as $20—that are completely unscratched except for their relatively very small barcode area, all tossed into a garbage can immediately adjacent to a ticket self-check barcode scanner at a local convenience store. It’s as though the buyer is in such a rush to procure his gambling fix that he doesn’t bother with the ticket’s just-paid-for game portion, which any non-addict would at least take the time to somehow enjoy. Indeed, one can find at many ticket vendor outlets such scary-looking accumulated examples of gambling addicts’ paper waste products.

As another example of B.C.’s publicly-owned lottery corporation’s exploitation of consumers, especially those predisposed to abusing BCLC’s product, the corporation also offers what I see as betting shops to the most concentrated consumer populated areas of the Greater Vancouver region. They’re locations at which one can mostly find the likes of the average Joe or laborer spending his time—perhaps along with a sizeable chunk of his paycheck—playing the potentially very addictive game of chance called Keno. Every time I walk through the Guildford mall I receive a brief rush of melancholy just by the sight of the jackpot-winner hopefuls standing inside one of these creepy places, staring up at the ceiling-mounted Keno-draw-number VDUs.

Becoming instantly rich by way of a lottery ticket can be a biggest dream realized—a fact plainly taken advantage of for quite some time. This large revenue-producing opportunity, however callous-hearted, was institutionalized in 1985 as the already-mentioned provincial government crown corporation, which owns and operates all officially established mainstream lottery ticket production and sales in this province. Yet even as enticing as is the idea of possibly holding a big-winning lottery ticket, it nevertheless remains a notion with virtually zero chance of attainment, as almost all faithful players already know. For example, the odds of a 6/6-numbers win with the Lotto 6/49 is 1 in 13,983,816—a truism culturally entrenched in the form of expressions and analogies comparing the quantifiably extreme unlikelihood of winning a large jackpot with the also-low odds of other specific occurrences.

Irregardless of this astronomically low chance of winning a jackpot, very many people continue to play on a grand scale. Unfortunately, however, a disproportionately large number of those players are the very folk who can little or least afford the cost of playing—not to mention the poorest OCD-enduring souls who are solidly addicted to the money-pit numbers-bet sport to a no-win-scenario degree. Thus the irony remains bitter, with those needing the money the most making up that demographic sub-segment that typically lose the most money to that bottomless pit.

As for learning what percentage of problem gamblers also suffer mental illness I futilely attempted to do so by contacting both BCLC and the Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA). Unless one or both of these entities has since then acquired and accumulated such statistics, the lack of accurate figurers reliably revealing what should be considered a pressing social issue instead reveals an apparent lack of serious official attention and action on gambling addiction.

________________

It’s quite rare, if at all, to learn of unethical BCLC marketing practices from reading large metro-daily newspapers; but to actually experience for oneself the plain corruption on the part of that same news-media in regards to its ad-revenue relationship with BCLC was for me unheard of, until I came across its path for myself.

For a very short while The Vancouver Sun used to permit non-carte-blanch-nobody writers to post essays on its website’s Community of Interest section, of course without getting into libelous territory. Apparently there were too many unconventional and, for editorial sake, overly nonconformist perspectives being voiced via the refreshingly true ‘free-press’; for it—with the exception of the almost entirely conventional, conformist carte-blanch-somebody Community of Interest writers—was resultantly destined to be an all too brief opportunity by such average no-name writers like me.

Of a total of eleven essays that I had posted on that Community of Interest website—all of which questioned to a warranted degree societal norms and institutions that are clearly ethically and/or morally corrupt—only one was deleted and re-deleted when I re-posted it a second and third time. It was the only one adequately critical of the British Columbia Lottery Corporation’s lack of humanity on a few different fronts regarding its promotion of gambling for the sole sake of additional revenue.

But be it noted that the BCLC essay was generally nothing more nor less unconventional, controversial or ‘offensive’ than any of my other ten acceptable essay postings.

It took a moment, but it dawned on me: the countless full-page BCLC ads frequenting the broadsheet Vancouver Sun, sometimes twice in the same week, prepped and well paid for by (what a coincidence!) BCLC; indeed it’s one of the, if not the, most prolific advertiser in that newspaper, not to mention its sister metro-daily newspaper The Province.

As for the theoretical though in actuality nonsensical notion of a ‘free press’, apparently they’re about as free as are the full-page ads within.

Frank G Sterle Jr (July 2014)

Taking All of THEIR Bull(ying)

LIKE many other people, I, though far from being an innocent student or kid, was bullied as a youth (mostly my early teens), although atypically to a degree surpassing that experienced by the average youth or youths as a collective.

In fact, as one burdened (and it showed via my behavior) since birth with emotional over-sensitivity—i.e. “Frank, you take life way too seriously!”—I thus attracted all the more the type who could seemingly smell such susceptibility in a potential bullying recipient, quite like a shark to bloody waters.

The first very formidable authority figure bully with whom I was terrifyingly trapped was my Grade 2 teacher: A mischievous friend and I would often be denied recess, lunch and/or after-school-hours leave; or we’d receive sheet after sheet after sheet of lined paper upon which to ‘write lines,’ sometimes until we each had a small pile of about a couple dozen. It was absolutely absurd; and because my friend seemingly couldn’t behave himself, I got dragged down along with him—indeed, plus some. From recollection, I actually would endure a considerable deal more. My friend being of indigenous-nation heritage, one might’ve expected that, being the early 1970s, he’d likely have been the one upon whom a brute teacher would focus her fury. But, no, it was to be me, the red-headed kid, who’d receive most of Mrs. Carol’s wrath during 2nd Grade. Although I can’t recall her abuse against me in its entirety, I’ll nevertheless always remember how she had the immoral audacity—and especially the unethical confidence in avoiding any professional repercussions—to blatantly readily aim and fire her knee towards my groin, as I was backed up against the school hall wall. Fortunately, though, she missed her mark, instead hitting the top of my left leg.

With clear hindsight, I feel confident saying that when I was in grade school some teachers had signed up for their corrupted corner of the teaching profession in large part to enjoy the power trip over very young and helpless children, who were forced to go to school on a daily basis by parents who naïvely held unconditional confidence in such ‘educators’. Though there were other monster teachers, for me Mrs. Carol was uniquely traumatizing. For other students, however, there was her sole Grade 2 counterpart, the creepy Mrs. Clemens, situated in the classroom immediately next door; and not surprising, the pair were quite friendly with each other.

They were the true nightmare teacher scenario for a lot of very young students back in the day.

Mrs. Clemens was similarly abusive but with the additional bizarre, scary attribute of her eyes jerking side to side when she talked to you or her class. It was rumored she had a heroin addiction, though I don’t recall hearing of any solid proof of that.

I remember one fellow second-grader’s mother going door to door in my part of town seeking out any other case of a student who, like her son, had been assaulted by that teacher. I had not told anyone about my own ordeal with my (the other) Grade 2 teacher, and I just stood there silently as my astonished mother conversed with the woman. It now seems to me that as each grade passed, I increasingly realized how all recipients of corporeal handling/abuse in my school were boys; and I then reasoned to myself that maybe it was because men can take care of themselves and boys are basically little men. It was the early/mid 1970s, after all.

With all ordealic second-grade things coming to an end, I moved on to Grade 3, during which the afternoon teacher on one occasion mockingly humiliated me before the class. She questioned my alleged lack of intelligence with incredulity after I asked her a question that she considered to be stupid.

____

By far the worst of the bullying that I’d endure at the non-mercy of enough student peers occurred during Grade 8-9, until I decided to acquire my GED at the exceptionally student/teacher friendly White Rock Work & Learn program. While in regular high school, I just barely passed my Grade 8 and 9 essentials—Math, Science and English—so I was able to leave that tormenting environment behind, since Work & Learn taught a compact version of Grade 10-12.

It’s worth noting that I ‘skipped out’ of about half of all high school days during Grade 8-9, instead happily spending them at YVR airport.

There, I received greatly needed, lengthy, pleasant escape from perpetual high school hell, usually while pretending that I was actually waiting to catch a flight somewhere, anywhere preferably a great distance away. Yes, I missed a lot of schooling, but it was a much better option for me than enduring the awful alternative—typically unrelenting bullying, which would’ve prevented my weary mind from sufficient learning, anyway.

But before I escaped high school, I first had to endure the ordeal of having my Grade 9 science teacher single me out from the entire class, scold me and then tell me that the virtually-nothing offense I’d allegedly committed was “why [so many students] don’t like you!”—all while a girl on whom I had a (went nowhere) crush for many years sat behind me. I could not believe my ears, and I wondered how in hell I got myself (though I’d earned nothing of the sort that I’d so brutally received) into such an incredibly demeaning, humiliating situation—and that was when I truly felt like dying.

Although the experience wasn’t in any way physical, to me it felt more damaging psychologically, especially to an already scarred teenage psyche. Oh, yes—glory days.

Following my drug experimental summer capping the high school nightmare, I began Work & Learn and thus a journey into a strengthening of my self-esteem. There, it was pretty much fulltime peace of mind, though unfortunately it also involved getting into frequent illicit drug use (which I’m sure would’ve occurred anyway had I remained in high school).

Most significant for me, however, was my meeting and befriending of two of the toughest, if not the toughest, guys (a few years my senior) in the White Rock and South Surrey area; and perhaps not surprising, they were foster home reared guys for many years prior to my connecting with them.

I began to stand my ground, hang out at the local arcade—called Laser Palace though nicknamed by a few as Loser Palace—and readily enough get into a street fight (during which I’d expect to receive notable licks), though unfortunately too often at the drop of a hat. Eventually, I realized that standing up to some asshole seeking an easy victim may cost me at first, but he’d soon enough get the message that I was not, or at least no longer, just a ‘cupcake.’

Soon enough, my assertive-aggressiveness evolved into a nasty, unpredictable chip on my shoulder the size of a Rubic’s Cube. My new surly attitude craved over-compensation for the plethora of times throughout my youth that I allowed myself to be physically, verbally and/or emotionally assaulted. While carrying around with me such a psychologically burdensome, multifaceted grudge, which existed mostly in the form of a mental list of scores to settle, I also began hanging out with local “skids” inside and outside of the small, nearby mall.

It was at the center seating area of that mall that I bumped into a former high school bully who’d singled me out during my first six weeks of high school, about three years earlier. He’d always spew insults at me, mostly regarding my weight, and challenge me to scraps. (Those six weeks ended with me getting suspended, which then moved me on to the second and last high school I’d endure.)

So, then and there at that mall but a few years later, he was talking with me as though he and I, during those first six weeks of high school when he’d made life for me miserable, were somewhat like equals: “Remember how we were the fat kids who everybody tried to pick fights with?” (FYI: He was always taller and larger than most, but he definitely was not at all one of “the fat kids” with whom any other guy would “pick fights with”!) I said absolutely nothing in response, for I didn’t know what the hell he was talking about. He and I, together, getting picked on?! Maybe he’s confused me with someone else, I rhetorically asked myself.

Unless I’d been losing my weary mind all of that terrible time, he, on his very own, was my most dreaded reality of going to high school every morning for the first one and a half months of Grade 8; he was in fact the asshole who gave me the hardest time. And then, a few years later, we’d somehow, suddenly become a bonded pair from ‘our’ past persecution?!

Sure enough, however, even his phony—or outright self-deluded—version of the true bully injustice that he’d served me while just beginning high school wouldn’t last: One sunny morning at the Loser Palace arcade, he talked me out of whatever money I had on my person, sixteen dollars, with a blatant BS intent upon turning it into some cannabis for me. Henceforth, every time I’d insist upon the whereabouts of my money or otherwise promised cannabis, even more BS excuses came out of his mouth. That was far more like the prick I knew and endured but a few years prior.

However, it would take almost three more decades for me to learn that I myself, according to topic research terminology, would currently be classified as a “bully-victim,” since I have/had been doing my own share of what is now considered to be forms of bullying activity. Beginning as an eight-year-old boy teasing my older sister to borderline madness and occasionally even to tears, I was on my own journey away from innocence and towards an albeit much milder form of bully-ville.

____ 

A person filled with fear at just being in the presence of an unrelenting bully is at a great psychological and therefore physical disadvantage, as far as defending oneself goes. The well experienced bully can usually sense fear—or on the other hand, a complete lack thereof—emanating from his target victim and thus react accordingly.

From a more personal perspective, the dangerously debilitating effect of succumbing to fear—or contrarily, the greatly empowering effect of controlling and even eliminating fear—when it comes to physical confrontations, usually means the difference between getting thoroughly thrashed and, on the other hand, getting safely through the conflict with one’s confidence intact and minimal, if any, lacerations.

Meanwhile, although there’s an on-going ‘war against bullying’ to hopefully minimize and eventually eliminate bullying trauma suffered by victims, there’s little mentioned in the media how the chronically bullied boy can grow up to become an unrestrainedly enraged bully himself. But there are those, regardless of minority or majority quantity status, who apparently outright defy the said potential bullied-turned-bully scenario:

I can recall one boy from elementary school and another from my Grade 8-9 stretch who were both bullied to unusual extremes. Seven to nine years after I’d last seen each, I came across and dialogued at length with each of them. Yet unlike me, at that time they very much appeared to not at all be wearing and bearing any chips of any size upon their shoulders (which I felt was, particularly on a mental health level, great for them); though I’d have presumed that especially they would be lugging around with them at least some major baggage.

Then again, both past victims of massive and/or chronic bullying might have just been wearing a temporary façade of life contentment, but I perceived their ‘normal person’ (albeit brief) social interaction with me, and apparently also in maintaining employment, as genuinely psychologically functional.

Frank G Sterle Jr (Originally written on January 14, 2014, but adjusted/rewritten multiple times since.)

(OBSERVATIONAL VERSE) An Exposed Mentality of Meagre Worth Measured Then Coldly Calculated Into Column Inches

Bamako in mourning as radical group names the gunmen behind Mali hotel attack

BAMAKO, Mali (AP)—Mali began a three-day mourning period with flags flying at half-staff on Monday for victims of the assault on a luxury hotel full of foreigners, a day after a dueling claim of responsibility emerged.

The Islamic extremist group, Al-Mourabitoun, that first claimed responsibility for Friday’s assault issued a new audio recording identifying the two gunmen, according to a Mauritanian news site that often receives messages from Malian extremists.

The group said the two were the only assailants in the attack that killed 19 people. Initial reports from witnesses and officials suggested there could have been as many as 10 gunmen. The bodies of only two gunmen were recovered from the scene.

The recording from the Al-Mourabitoun (The Sentinels) group identified the gunmen as Abdel Hakim Al-Ansari and Moadh Al-Ansari, Al-Akhbar said in an article posted online Sunday. No nationalities were given, though the name “Al-Ansari” suggests they were both Malian.

Meanwhile, a different extremist group that emerged only this year also issued a claim of responsibility for the attack. The claim, reported Sunday by French media, underscores the shifting alliances and memberships of the extremist groups operating in Mali and nearby countries.

The new group, the Macina Liberation Front, is active in central Mali and said it had worked with yet another militant group, Ansar Dine. The claim said the attack was in retaliation for Operation Barkhane, the regional French fight against Islamic extremists, according to Radio France Internationale.

France’s Defense Ministry on Monday provided new details of French support during the siege, describing in a statement how 40 French special forces arrived in Bamako at 3 p.m. and helped Malian forces move floor by floor “to flush out the terrorists.” Two of the troops were slightly injured, the statement said.

Officials in this former French colony have said they are searching for more than three suspects who may have been involved in the attack, though they have provided no other details on the possible leads.

In the absence of clear information, analysts have speculated on other possible motives, including a desire to disrupt Mali’s fragile local peace process or a wish by al-Qaida and its affiliates to demonstrate its relevance amid high-profile attacks by its rival, the Islamic State group.

Al-Mourabitoun has links to al-Qaida and the group’s first statement on Friday described collaboration with al-Qaida’s “Sahara Emirate.”

On Monday morning, the national flag outside Prime Minister Modibo Keita’s office was lowered to half-staff just after sunrise. Burkina Faso Prime Minister Lt. Col. Yacouba Isaac Zida was in town to express his condolences, and Benin President Thomas Boni Yayi was expected Monday afternoon.

“We are aware that the country is in crisis and we must stand with the victim’s families,” said Makan Kone, a spokesman for Keita, adding that the ceremony was “to show our pain for the death of 19 people.”

November 24, 2015, The Associated Press

____________________________________________________________________________

For many years, I had suspected it: the profoundly impoverished, sad-looking souls in the photo that accompanied the news story (above) which I just spotted in the local freebee metro-daily are all human beings after all, and can likely even experience suffering just like us far more fortunate folks in the fully developed, ‘civilized’ world. Had I not seen this atypically-published story, I may have never even thought it possible. Perhaps since the Mali government spoke of the said 19 victims of suicide bombers like the victims were/are indeed human beings, much of the large global news-media thus also perhaps found them worthy of a relatively large part of the page—or maybe it was vice versa—yet all nonetheless done regardless of the extremely hazardous part of the globe in which they reside.

_________________________________________________

“Mentality (noun) [often derogatory]: the characteristic attitude of mind or way of thinking of a person or group.”  —The New Oxford Dictionary of English

With news-stories’ human subjects’ race and culture dictating

quantity of media coverage of even the poorest of souls,

a renowned newsman formulated a startling equation

justly implicating collective humanity’s news-consuming callousness

—“A hundred Pakistanis going off a mountain in a bus

make less of a story than three Englishmen drowning in the Thames.”

According to this unjust news-media mentality reasonably deduced

five hundred prolongedly-war-weary Middle Eastern Arabs getting blown

to bits in the same day perhaps should take up even less space and airtime.

So readily learned is the tiny token short story buried in the bottom

right-hand corner of the newspaper’s last page, the so brief account

involving a long-lasting war about which there’s virtually absolutely

nothing civil; therefore caught in the warring web are civilians most

unfortunate, most weak, the very most in need of peace and civility.

And it’s naught but business as usual in the damned nations

where such severe suffering almost entirely dominates the

fractured structured daily routine of civilian slaughter

(plus that of the odd well-armed henchman) mostly by means

of bomb blasts from incendiary explosive devices,

rock-fire fragments and shell shock readily shared with freshly shredded

shrapnel wounds resulting from smart bombs sometimes launched for

the stupidest of reasons into crowded markets and grade schools …

Hence where humane consideration and conduct were unquestionably

due post haste came only few allocated seconds of sound bite—a half minute

if news-media were with extra space or time to spare—and one or two

printed paragraphs on page twenty-three of Section C; such news

consumed in the stable fully developed, fully ‘civilized’ Western world

by heads slowly shaking at the barbarity of ‘those people’ in that

war-torn strife which has forced tens of thousands of civilians to post haste

gather what’s left of their shattered lives and limbs and flee …

Thus comes the imminent point at which such meager-measure

couple-column-inches coverage—if any at all—reflects the civil

Western readers’ accumulating apathy towards such dime-a-dozen

disaster zones of the globe, all accompanied by a large yawn; then the

said readers subconsciously perceive even greater human-life devaluation

from the miniscule ‘hundreds-dead-yet-again’ coverage.

Consequently continues the self-perpetuation of the token-two-column-inch

(non)coverage as the coldly calculated worth of such common mass slaughter,

ergo those many-score violently lost human lives are somehow worth

so much the less than, say, three Englishmen drowning in the Thames.

Perhaps had they all been cases of the once-persecuted suddenly

persecuting or the once-weak wreaking havoc upon their neighboring indigenous

minorities—perhaps then there’d be far more compassionately just coverage?

The human mind is said to be worth much more than the sum of the

human body’s parts, though that psyche may somehow seem to be of

lesser value if all that’s left is naught but bomb-blast-dismembered body parts.

(Frank Sterle Jr, March 28, 2017)

“Guys with cats … I don’t know.”

THERE are some guys who’ll understandably hesitate at speaking in public about their particular fondness for pet felines; for, to do so, unlike with expressing affection for a good sturdy canine friend, may be generally stereotyped as a man’s non-testosterone pet-animal inclination.  

And, yes, there are people out there who’d implicitly or explicitly question the normality altogether of a guy who adores his pet feline(s)—something that’s implied by first-season Seinfeld’s George Costanza. In a doubtful tone of voice while shaking his head, George says to Elaine Benes in regards to her new boyfriend’s affection for his two pet felines: “Guys with cats … I don’t know.”

George’s line rushed to mind after one particular response I received upon posting a short essay onto a feline-fan site (accompanied by an adorable feline photo, of course); it was from a reader subtly questioning my ‘normality’, which left me feeling both embarrassed and angry. 

It also brought to mind an early-1990s Vancouver Sun letter to the editor—aptly titled “A Man With a Cat Is Where It’s At”—in which the writer, a straight guy who adored his two pet felines, responded to some recently published cat-critical commentary. He frankly cautioned straight single women about relationship-seeking heterosexual guys who love dogs but dislike domesticated felines; for, what such men really want in a mate is, basically, submission—unlike the dudes with cats who more than appreciate a companion’s independent nature as well as a silky soft touch.

Within, Steve Eykel of New Westminster wrote the following response to another letter author’s cat-belittling: “Let me take a wild guess: [the writer] is a dog person, not a cat person. It’s not too surprising really. After all, a dog will lick your hand, grovel, cringe, do tricks and generally make you feel like the big strong alpha male you wish you could be. A cat will do none of these things. Women take note! This is an acid test for any man’s character. A man who prefers dogs is looking for subservience; a man who prefers cats is looking for a partner. You heard it here first.”

I further recollected how as a teen I knew two of the toughest, testosterone-laden and, like myself, straight guys around (whom I always tried to emulate), who also cherished their pet cats, though privately. Given the tough-guy environment of that place and time, however, no male would have dared openly express his cat enthusiasm to his large peer group, lest he seriously risk having his reputation permanently besmirched as ‘a wuss’.

Even today, three and a half decades later, that ‘real man’ masculinity mentality may not have diminished much. Perhaps revelatory is the June 24, 2020, Toronto Now article headlined “Keep Cats Out of Your Dating Profile, Ridiculous Study Suggests” and sub-headlined “Men were deemed less masculine and less attractive when they held up cats in their dating pics, according to researchers”.

Source: http://www.nowtoronto.com/lifestyle/love-and-sex/cats-dating-profile-study

(Frank G Sterle Jr)